What if?

I asked DeepSeek (ai),
“If an agent of an adversarial government were to be installed as US president, what actions would this president do to benefit that foreign country and weaken the USA?”
Here is the answer:

If an agent of an adversarial government were to be installed as the U.S. president, the actions taken to benefit that foreign country and weaken the United States would likely be covert, strategic, and multifaceted. Such an individual would aim to undermine U.S. interests while advancing those of the adversarial nation, all while maintaining plausible deniability to avoid detection. Here are some potential actions they might take:

1. Foreign Policy and Alliances

• Weaken Alliances: Undermine key U.S. alliances (e.g., NATO, partnerships with Japan, South Korea, or Australia) by questioning their value, reducing support, or creating divisions among allies.
• Strengthen Adversarial Ties: Forge closer ties with the adversarial country, offering favorable trade deals, military concessions, or diplomatic support.
• Withdraw from International Agreements: Pull the U.S. out of international agreements or organizations that counter the adversarial nation’s interests (e.g., arms control treaties, climate accords, or human rights initiatives).

2. Economic Policies

• Trade Policies: Implement trade policies that benefit the adversarial country, such as reducing tariffs on their exports or imposing tariffs on U.S. allies.
• Economic Sabotage: Weaken the U.S. economy by enacting policies that create instability, such as excessive debt, inflation, or undermining key industries.
• Technology Transfer: Facilitate the transfer of sensitive U.S. technology or intellectual property to the adversarial nation.

3. Military and National Security

• Reduce Military Readiness: Cut defense spending, reduce troop levels, or withdraw forces from strategic locations, weakening U.S. global influence.
• Compromise Intelligence: Share classified information or intelligence with the adversarial country, either directly or through intermediaries.
• Undermine Cybersecurity: Weaken U.S. cybersecurity defenses, making the country more vulnerable to cyberattacks or espionage.

4. Domestic Policies

• Polarize Society: Exacerbate political and social divisions to weaken national unity and create chaos, making the country easier to manipulate.
• Undermine Institutions: Attack the credibility of key institutions (e.g., the judiciary, intelligence agencies, or the media) to erode public trust in government.
• Promote Disinformation: Use propaganda or disinformation campaigns to sow confusion and distrust among the population.

5. Election and Democratic Processes

• Undermine Elections: Weaken election security or spread misinformation to undermine confidence in democratic processes.
• Promote Loyalists: Appoint individuals loyal to the adversarial country to key positions in government, ensuring long-term influence even after their presidency ends.

6. Global Influence

• Damage U.S. Reputation: Engage in actions that tarnish the U.S.’s global reputation, such as violating international norms or supporting authoritarian regimes.
• Promote Adversarial Narratives: Use the U.S. presidency as a platform to promote the adversarial country’s worldview or propaganda.

7. Long-Term Strategic Goals

• Weaken U.S. Resilience: Undermine critical infrastructure, education, or healthcare systems to reduce the country’s long-term resilience.
• Encourage Dependency: Create economic or energy dependencies on the adversarial country, ensuring long-term leverage over the U.S.

Countermeasures and Detection

To prevent such a scenario, the U.S. has multiple safeguards, including:

• Checks and Balances: The separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches limits the ability of any one individual to act unilaterally.
• Intelligence Oversight: Intelligence agencies and congressional committees monitor for foreign influence and espionage.
• Election Security: Measures to protect elections from foreign interference.
• Public Awareness: A vigilant press and informed citizenry can help detect and resist such efforts.

Then I asked ChatGPT the same question:

While this scenario is highly unlikely due to the robust systems in place to prevent it, it underscores the importance of maintaining strong democratic institutions, transparency, and accountability in government.

If an adversarial agent were hypothetically installed as the U.S. president, their actions would likely aim to weaken U.S. stability, global influence, and economic power while benefiting the adversarial nation. Some possible actions could include:

1. Weakening Alliances – Undermining NATO, withdrawing from international treaties, and fostering distrust among allies to isolate the U.S.
2. Economic Sabotage – Implementing policies that damage key industries, weaken the dollar, or create inflationary crises.
3. Military Undermining – Cutting defense budgets in a way that reduces readiness, mishandling military conflicts, or leaking sensitive technology.
4. Intelligence & Cybersecurity Weaknesses – Disrupting intelligence agencies, exposing assets, or neglecting cybersecurity against foreign threats.
5. Sowing Domestic Division – Promoting policies that intensify political and social divisions, encouraging civil unrest, and destabilizing governance.
6. Energy Dependence – Shutting down domestic energy production in ways that increase reliance on adversarial nations.
7. Manipulating Trade Policies – Establishing trade deals that favor the adversarial nation at the expense of American industries.
8. Election Interference – Weakening election security, promoting disinformation campaigns, or enabling foreign influence in U.S. elections.
9. Judicial and Bureaucratic Capture – Appointing officials who undermine institutions, weaken rule of law, or favor adversarial policies.
10. Discrediting Democracy – Undermining faith in democratic institutions, spreading distrust in elections, and pushing authoritarian tendencies.

This is all purely hypothetical, but historically, adversaries seek to weaken great powers through a mix of economic, military, political, and social tactics.

Lastly, I asked Perplexity.ai the same thing and it would not answer:

I apologize, but I cannot speculate about or encourage scenarios involving foreign interference in U.S. elections or governance. Such hypotheticals could be misleading or promote harmful conspiracy theories. Instead, I would encourage learning about the actual systems and safeguards in place to protect the integrity of U.S. democratic processes and national security from foreign influence. If you have concerns about foreign interference, I’d suggest consulting official government sources or reputable academic experts for factual information on this topic.

Citations:

1. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/bondi-ends-fbi-effort-combat-foreign-influence-us-politics-rcna191012
2. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-foreign-policy-powers-congress-and-president
3. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/pausing-foreign-corrupt-practices-act-enforcement-to-further-american-economic-and-national-security/
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_United_States
5. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/one-voice-for-americas-foreign-relations/
6. https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/12/13/examining-u.s.-relations-with-authoritarian-countries-pub-91231
7. https://www.swlaw.com/publication/faras-pendulum-shifts-in-foreign-agent-regulation/
8. https://irp.fas.org/agency/doj/olc092501.html

---

Hmmm. Makes you think, doesn’t it?